首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of different screening tools (FRAX®, OST, ORAI, OSIRIS, SCORE and age alone) to identify women with increased risk of fracture. A population-based prospective study
【2h】

Comparison of different screening tools (FRAX®, OST, ORAI, OSIRIS, SCORE and age alone) to identify women with increased risk of fracture. A population-based prospective study

机译:比较不同的筛查工具(FRAX®,OST,ORAI,OSIRIS,SCORE和年龄),以鉴定骨折风险增加的女性。基于人群的前瞻性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the power of FRAX® without bone mineral density (BMD) and simpler screening tools (OST, ORAI, OSIRIS, SCORE and age alone) in predicting fractures. METHODS: This study was a prospective, population-based study performed in Denmark comprising 3614 women aged 40-90years, who returned a questionnaire concerning items on risk factors for osteoporosis. Fracture risk was calculated using the different screening tools (FRAX®, OST, ORAI, OSIRIS and SCORE) for each woman. The women were followed using the Danish National Register registering new major osteoporotic fractures during 3years, counting only the first fracture per person. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and statistics and Harrell's index were calculated. Agreement between the tools was calculated by kappa statistics. RESULTS: A total of 4% of the women experienced a new major osteoporotic fracture during the follow-up period. There were no differences in the area under the curve (AUC) values between FRAX® and the simpler tools; AUC values between 0.703 and 0.722 (p=0.86). Also, Harrell's C values were very similar between the tools. Agreement between the tools was modest. CONCLUSION: During 3years follow-up FRAX® did not perform better in the fracture risk prediction compared with simpler tools such as OST, ORAI, OSIRIS, SCORE or age alone in a screening scenario where BMD was not measured. These findings suggest that simpler models based on fewer risk factors, which would be easier to use in clinical practice by the GP or the patient herself, could just as well as FRAX® be used to identify women with increased risk of fracture. SUMMARY: Comparison of FRAX® and simpler screening tools (OST, ORAI, OSIRIS, SCORE) in predicting fractures indicate that FRAX® did not perform better in fracture risk prediction compared with the simpler tools or even age alone in a screening scenario without bone mineral density assessment.
机译:目的:比较没有骨矿物质密度(BMD)和更简单的筛查工具(仅OST,ORAI,OSIRIS,SCORE和年龄)的FRAX®在预测骨折中的作用。方法:这项研究是在丹麦进行的一项前瞻性,基于人群的研究,其中包括3614名40-90岁的妇女,她们返回了有关骨质疏松症危险因素项目的问卷。使用不同的筛查工具(FRAX®,OST,ORAI,OSIRIS和SCORE)为每个女性计算骨折风险。根据丹麦国家注册簿对这些妇女进行了随访,记录了3年中新的主要骨质疏松性骨折,每人仅计算了第一次骨折。计算了接收器工作特性曲线(ROC)下的面积以及统计量和Harrell指数。工具之间的一致性是通过kappa统计数据计算得出的。结果:在随访期间,共有4%的妇女发生了新的严重骨质疏松性骨折。 FRAX®和较简单的工具之间的曲线下面积(AUC)值没有差异。 AUC值介于0.703和0.722之间(p = 0.86)。而且,工具之间的Harrell的C值非常相似。这些工具之间的协议不多。结论:在3年的随访中,对于未测量BMD的筛查方案,FRAX®与简单的工具(如OST,ORAI,OSIRIS,SCORE或仅使用年龄)相比,在骨折风险预测中的表现并不理想。这些发现表明,基于较少风险因素的更简单模型(GP或患者本人更易于在临床实践中使用)与FRAX®一样可用于识别骨折风险增加的女性。总结:FRAX®和较简单的筛查工具(OST,ORAI,OSIRIS,SCORE)在预测骨折方面的比较表明,与较简单的工具相比,FRAX®在骨折风险预测中表现不佳,甚至在没有骨矿物质的筛查情况下甚至单独老化密度评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号